Partners in same-sex relationships have pointed out in online  comments that their partnerships, whether formally called marriage or  not, have lasted decades. Other gay-rights supporters rage that it's  people like Kardashian who harm the institution of marriage, not the gay  and lesbian couples who want to wed.
 Much as I support same-sex marriage rights, this argument doesn't  wash and does no good to advance the cause. Opponents of gay marriage  will simply say that both quick divorce and same-sex weddings cheapen the institution.
Beyond that, the argument for same-sex marriage shouldn't be about  how long such marriages will last. Some marriages between heterosexual  couples will end quickly, and so will some same-sex marriages. Some  heterosexual unions are strong and loving, and others are fraught with  problems. Same for gay and lesbian relationships.
The reason to support same-sex marriage isn't about whether such  couples will form better households or stay together longer. It's that  marriage is a basic civil right. Just as it cannot be withheld from  couples based on their race or religion, it should not be forbidden to  couples based on their sexual orientation. Whether those marriages  ultimately prove to be stronger on average than heterosexual marriages  is irrelevant. We don't ban adults from marrying based on a perception  that their marriages won't last, and we shouldn't, whether they are gay,  straight or Kim Kardashian.
No comments:
Post a Comment